1. Catalogs
  2. General Dynamics NASSCO
  3. Shipbuilder-Assessment-American-Marine-Highway
video corpo

Shipbuilder-Assessment-American-Marine-Highway

Shipbuilder-Assessment-American-Marine-Highway
1 / 48 PagesView full catalog

Shipbuilder-Assessment-American-Marine-Highway

Product catalog summary
Executive Summary
This report by General Dynamics NASSCO evaluates America's Marine Highways (AMH) as a potential market for U.S. shipbuilders, particularly under the Jones Act. The study focuses on freight services via coastal waters and river systems with at least one U.S. port of call. The potential market for AMH is significant, with opportunities for building 30 to 200 vessels, which could fill a projected gap in shipbuilding production.
Market Potential and Benefits
The report highlights the substantial market potential for AMH, with freight tonnage expected to double by 2035. Millions of trailer loads could be eligible for marine transport, particularly along the Gulf Coast and Pacific Coast corridors. AMH offers benefits such as congestion mitigation, infrastructure maintenance, homeland security, safety, environmental advantages, and strengthening the maritime industrial base.
Challenges and Roadblocks
Despite its potential, AMH faces challenges such as economic viability, the Harbor Maintenance Tax (HMT), and perceptions of the Jones Act. The HMT is a significant disincentive, adding costs to cargo moved over water. The report emphasizes the need for AMH to be commercially viable, safe, reliable, and cost-competitive with trucking.
Path Forward
The report suggests roles for shipbuilders and other stakeholders in promoting AMH. Economic investment, policy shifts, and state and local involvement are crucial for progress. The report calls for a marketing campaign to improve AMH branding and perception.
Conclusions and Recommendations
AMH has the potential to become a significant part of the domestic freight network, but requires overcoming economic and policy hurdles. The report recommends leveraging international experience and series production to reduce costs, and addressing landside costs as a major economic roadblock.
Introduction
The document discusses the current state and potential of America's Marine Highways (AMH) from the perspective of U.S. shipbuilders. It highlights the historical significance of maritime transport in the U.S. and the decline in its use due to the rise of land-based transport systems. The document argues for the revitalization of AMH as a solution to increasing freight demands and as an opportunity for U.S. shipbuilders.
Economic and Environmental Analysis
Commercial economic analyses often overlook external factors such as congestion, road wear, and emissions, which affect the competitiveness of Marine Highways compared to traditional over-land modes. The document emphasizes the public benefits of AMH, including national defense, increased goods movement capacity, and economic stimulus.
Reducing Costs of AMH Vessels
The document suggests that labor costs in the U.S. are not the primary factor in shipbuilding expenses; rather, the volume of production is key. U.S. shipyards produce significantly fewer ships compared to international counterparts. Recommendations include designing vessels for multiple markets to enable series production, leveraging international partnerships to reduce costs, and adopting emissions mitigation technologies.
Economic Impact and Funding
The economic multiplier effect of shipbuilding is significant, with every dollar spent generating 2.8 dollars of economic activity. The Title XI loan guarantee program is highlighted as a crucial funding mechanism, with potential to generate substantial economic impact and job creation.
Transportation Policy and Public Awareness
The document identifies the need for a national transportation policy that includes AMH and addresses modal options. It calls for increased public awareness and consistent messaging to gain support for AMH. The lack of a unified coalition to advocate for AMH is noted as a barrier.
Recommendations for Stakeholders
The document outlines several recommendations for stakeholders, including removing the Harbor Maintenance Tax on domestic cargo, creating a national transportation policy, funding research and development programs, and providing federal grants for port infrastructure. Collaboration between government and non-governmental organizations is encouraged to influence policy and secure funding.
Conclusion
AMH presents a unique opportunity for U.S. shipbuilders to engage in series production, which could revitalize the industry and provide economic benefits. The document concludes that overcoming roadblocks to AMH requires coordinated efforts from all stakeholders, including policy changes and increased public support.
Introduction
The document discusses the potential and challenges of implementing America's Marine Highways (AMH) for domestic freight transport. It highlights the perspectives of various stakeholders, including ports, labor, shipbuilders, and the public, and outlines the market potential for different marine highway services.
Challenges and Stakeholder Perspectives
  • Ports: Primary ports are concerned about increased congestion and emissions, while secondary terminals face high drayage costs. Government support is needed to facilitate access.
  • Labor: Labor is open to negotiating favorable rates for AMH, but viable rates need to be established.
  • U.S. Shipbuilders: Ready to build AMH vessels but require collaboration with operators to reduce costs.
  • Public Awareness: Limited awareness of AMH benefits necessitates an informational campaign.
  • Environmental Concerns: Trucks are projected to be cleaner by 2012, but vessel emissions depend on fuel choice and speed. Emissions mitigation technology can reduce emissions compared to trucks, but redistribution of emissions to coastal communities is a concern.
Market Potential
The report identifies three main markets for Marine Highways:
  • Domestic Corridors: Involves diverting trailers from trucks or rail to coastal vessels between U.S. ports. Successful corridors include the U.S. West Coast, East Coast, Gulf, and Great Lakes.
  • Container-Feeder Services: Aims to reduce congestion at major terminals by moving containers to secondary terminals via barge or small vessels.
  • International Corridors: Extends domestic corridors to include freight between the U.S. and Canada or Mexico.
Studies indicate significant potential for Marine Highways, with eligible coastal domestic volume justifying their implementation. However, the market is imbalanced, with northbound flows exceeding southbound flows.
Existing Services
Several existing service providers operate along the U.S. coasts, including Horizon Lines, Totem Ocean Trailer Express, and the Alaskan Marine Highways System on the West Coast, and Columbia Coastal and James River Barge Line on the East Coast. Gulf services include Osprey Lines and SeaBridge Freight.
Policy and Program Development
The Maritime Administration (MarAd) advocates for an enhanced marine highways network to alleviate congestion and improve air quality. The America’s Marine Highways Program aims to integrate waterways into the national transportation system, but lacks funding and political support.
Alternative Business Models
Two primary business models for Marine Highways are discussed:
  • Ferry Model: Allows both trailers and cabs to travel together, bypassing congestion and providing rest periods for drivers.
  • Cargo-only Model: Focuses on transporting trailers only, converting long-haul drivers to short-haul, increasing efficiency and driver retention.
Introduction to Cargo-Only Marine Highway Models
The document discusses the potential of cargo-only models in increasing the freight capacity of transportation networks. These models, ranging from door-to-door to port-to-port services, are seen as promising alternatives for enhancing the transportation system's efficiency.
Components of the Marine Highway System
The Marine Highway system is part of a larger transportation network that includes drayage trucks, yard tractors, trailers, ports, terminals, long-haul trucks or rail, and ships or barges. The integration and management of these components are crucial for the system's economic viability and efficiency.
Vessels for Marine Highways
The document outlines various vessel types proposed for America's Marine Highway (AMH) service, including container on barge, Roll-On/Roll-Off (Ro-Ro) vessels, and Ro-Pax designs. Ro-Ro operations with 53-foot domestic tractor-trailers are identified as the most viable option for short sea services.
Social Benefits of America's Marine Highway
Safety: AMH can enhance safety by reducing congestion and accidents on highways and removing hazardous materials from urban areas.
Congestion: The Marine Highway can alleviate congestion, which costs Americans $200 billion annually, by providing alternative routes for freight.
Wear and Tear on Highway System: The document highlights the financial burden of maintaining highways and suggests that AMH could reduce this by offering a cost-effective alternative.
Homeland Security: AMH can support national security by providing additional capacity for humanitarian aid and evacuations during emergencies.
Conclusion
The document emphasizes the importance of AMH in enhancing the transportation network's capacity, safety, and efficiency while providing economic and security benefits.
Overview: The document discusses the application of the Harbor Maintenance Tax (HMT), its impact on domestic water-borne cargo, and the potential effects of removing it. It also explores the role of the Department of Homeland Security in supporting strategic ports and the environmental considerations of Marine Highways.
Harbor Maintenance Tax (HMT): The HMT is a tax on cargo moving through ports, intended to fund harbor maintenance. However, the collected funds exceed the allocations, resulting in a surplus. The document suggests reviewing the tax's application, especially for domestic shipments, which face double taxation.
Strategic Ports and Homeland Security: Strategic Ports are crucial for military logistics, requiring high security to protect sensitive information. The Department of Homeland Security could assist in subsidizing these ports to enhance their security and operational efficiency.
Environmental Considerations: Marine Highways must demonstrate no net increase in emissions. The document highlights the challenges of emission reductions, especially in coastal regions, and the need for states to arbitrate environmental impacts. Technologies like Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) and Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) are recommended to reduce emissions.
Industrial Base Considerations: The Jones Act supports U.S. shipbuilding by requiring U.S.-built and operated vessels for domestic trade. This supports the industrial base, providing economic benefits and maintaining a skilled workforce. The Title XI loan guarantee program is highlighted as a significant economic stimulus for shipbuilding.
Economic Challenges: Marine Highways must be economically viable, with costs competitive with trucking. The document identifies drayage, terminal labor, and fuel costs as major economic barriers. It suggests partnerships between vessel operators and logistics providers to overcome investment challenges.
Perceptions of the Jones Act: The Jones Act mandates U.S. ownership and operation of vessels in domestic trade, supporting national defense and the shipbuilding industry. It ensures a stable workforce and levels the competitive field for U.S. operators.
Overview of the Jones Act and U.S. Shipbuilding
The Jones Act mandates that vessels transporting goods between U.S. ports be built in the United States, supporting the domestic shipbuilding industry and maintaining a skilled workforce for both commercial and military needs. Despite higher construction costs, the Act protects American jobs and investments.
Cost Factors in Marine Highways
While the cost of building Jones Act vessels is high, it is not the primary expense in freight movement. Landside transportation costs, such as terminal operations and trucking, are more significant. The high construction costs hinder investment, but series production could reduce these costs.
Labor Costs and Shipbuilding Volume
U.S. labor costs are competitive globally, but the low volume of ship production compared to countries like Korea and China increases costs. Increasing production volume could help reduce costs.
Recommendations for Cost Reduction
To lower costs, the U.S. shipbuilding industry should design vessels that meet market needs and produce them in quantity. Leveraging international designs and expertise can also reduce costs and risks.
Challenges in Adopting Marine Highways
There is reluctance to adopt new transport modes like Marine Highways due to concerns about delivery times and reliability. Overcoming this requires cost competitiveness and frequent sailings to match trucking services.
European Short Sea Shipping
Europe's short sea network developed out of necessity due to limited highway infrastructure and high fuel costs. Government support through programs like Marco Polo has been crucial.
Transportation Policy and Funding
Marine Highways lack direct federal funding, relying on creative use of existing programs. Public-private partnerships, like the Albany Express Barge Service, have been attempted but face challenges in gaining market share.
Port Infrastructure and Investment
Many U.S. ports can handle coastal services, but investment in infrastructure is needed. A balanced approach to port development is essential to support increased cargo volumes.
Need for a Marketing Campaign
America's Marine Highways suffer from a lack of public awareness and consistent messaging. A national marketing campaign is needed to educate stakeholders and promote Marine Highways as a viable transport mode.
Path Forward
To succeed, Marine Highways need to address financial profitability and public benefits. A cohesive plan and comprehensive informational campaign are essential to overcoming hurdles and gaining support.
Overview
The document discusses the potential and challenges of developing Marine Highways (AMH) in the U.S. It highlights the economic viability issues, the role of shipbuilders, international partnerships, and the need for policy shifts and economic investments to support AMH.
Economic Viability
Marine Highways face significant economic challenges, primarily due to high land-side costs and the fragmented nature of the trucking industry. The document suggests that solving the economic viability puzzle is crucial for overcoming other hurdles.
Role of Shipbuilders
U.S. shipbuilders can play a crucial role in advancing AMH by focusing on vessel designs that cater to multiple markets, reducing engineering and production costs, and embracing green technologies. International partnerships can help achieve these goals by leveraging global experience and designs.
International Partnerships
Partnerships with international shipyards can reduce costs and risks through technology transfer and established designs. The document cites successful examples in the product tanker market and emphasizes the importance of series production to lower costs.
Environmental Considerations
AMH can improve its perception by ensuring reduced emissions compared to other transport modes. Technologies like Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR), Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR), and sea water scrubbers are highlighted for their potential to mitigate emissions.
Economic Investment and Policy
Private operators and stakeholders should collaborate to reduce land-side costs. Programs like the Voluntary Intermodal Sealift Agreement (VISA) and Maritime Security Program (MSP) could be adapted for AMH to provide subsidies and support. The federal government could assist by directing federally funded goods to AMH services and protecting working waterfronts.
Perception and Education
AMH stakeholders need to challenge the perception of unreliability in coastal services. Collaboration with educational institutions and trade groups can help communicate the value of AMH and attract the next generation of maritime professionals.
Policy Shifts
A national strategy and comprehensive transportation discussion are recommended to integrate AMH into the U.S. transport system. This would involve consensus among leaders and stakeholders on the need for an integrated transport system.
Introduction
This document discusses the potential for a Marine Highways (AMH) network to address economic and infrastructure challenges in the United States. It highlights the need for a national transportation strategy that includes AMH as a viable mode of transport, alongside traditional road and rail systems.
National Transportation Strategy
The document advocates for a comprehensive national transportation strategy that integrates AMH. Key recommendations include:
  • Creating economic comparisons of infrastructure investments across different transport modes.
  • Facilitating access to alternative transport modes through federal support and incentives.
  • Investing in port infrastructure to support domestic cargo and reduce land-side costs.
  • Establishing a National Infrastructure Reinvestment Bank to fund diverse transportation projects.
State and Local Involvement
State and local governments are encouraged to invest in AMH infrastructure and collaborate with unions and regional stakeholders. This includes:
  • Leasing terminals to reduce transportation costs for marine-highway trailers.
  • Identifying strategic ports for AMH services.
  • Providing tax incentives and infrastructure maintenance funding.
Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs)
NGOs play a crucial role in aligning stakeholders and influencing policy. Key organizations include:
  • I-95 Corridor Coalition
  • Marine Highways Cooperative
  • Coastal Coalition
  • National Shipbuilding Research Panel (NSRP)
  • Center for Commercial Deployment of Transportation Technologies (CCDoTT)
Conclusions and Recommendations
The document concludes with recommendations for advancing AMH, including:
  • Developing a national transportation policy that includes AMH.
  • Creating a maritime version of the FAA’s Airport Improvement Program.
  • Removing the Harbor Maintenance Tax on domestic cargo.
  • Funding research and development for AMH vessel designs.
  • Revitalizing the Title XI shipbuilding loan guarantee program.
U.S. shipyards are encouraged to collaborate with international partners to reduce costs and improve vessel design efficiency.
Conclusion
The document emphasizes the importance of AMH in enhancing the U.S. transportation network, supporting economic growth, and providing strategic benefits to the military and commercial sectors.
See more

Catalog excerpts

Shipbuilder-Assessment-American-Marine-Highway-1

A Shipbuilder’s Assessment of America’s Marine Highways CCDOTT Concept AMH Vessel Prepared by General Dynamics NASSCO TOTE Vessel built by NASSCO - 2003 General Dynamics NASSCO 2798 East Harbor Drive San Diego, CA 92113

 Open the catalog to page 1
Shipbuilder-Assessment-American-Marine-Highway-3

Executive Summary This report provides a shipbuilder’s assessment of America’s Marine Highways (AMH), based on the body of knowledge as represented in current literature related to AMH, dialogue and debate at AMH conferences, insights from potential operators, and insights as a key stakeholder with relevant experience. We find the SNAME O-36 definition of America’s Marine Highways to be the most precise and adopt it for this study: “Freight service operations carrying either containerized or trailerized cargoes (or empties) via the coastal waters and river systems of North and Central America,...

 Open the catalog to page 3
Shipbuilder-Assessment-American-Marine-Highway-4

2035.3 The 2006 “Four Corridor Case Studies of Short-Sea Shipping Services” study conducted by Global Insight and Reeve and Associates evaluated opportunities on four potential domestic lanes: Gulf to/from Atlantic Coast Corridor, Atlantic Coast Corridor, Pacific Coast Corridor and Great Lakes Corridor. The study concluded that more than 78 million trailer loads of highway and rail intermodal freight moved along the US contiguous coasts in 2003 would have been eligible for consideration for Marine Highways transport. The Gulf Coast to the New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania (NYNJPA) region had...

 Open the catalog to page 4
Shipbuilder-Assessment-American-Marine-Highway-5

• o Provides much needed volume to U.S. shipbuilders, increases shipbuilding efficiency, maintains industrial capability, and reduces the cost of Navy vessels through reduced overhead o AMH series vessel production has the potential to create approximately 97,000 man-years of work with an economic output of $39B over a period of 10 years.5 Transportation System o Increased goods movement capacity and improved utilization of resources Despite the anticipated benefits, market potential, the conceptual potential of AMH as a complimentary mode within the existing domestic freight intermodal network,...

 Open the catalog to page 5
Shipbuilder-Assessment-American-Marine-Highway-6

AMH has always existed as a form of transport in the U.S. Early American colonists stayed connected to other settlements to trade and barter goods using ships that moved up and down what is now the New England coast. The report, “America’s Deep Blue Highway,” by the Tufts Fletcher School in September 2008, talks extensively about how early coastal shipping had a binding influence within a young nation. Shipping goods between ports created towns that grew into cities. Maritime transportation was a critical element of the country’s prosperity and security well into the 20th century, as evidenced...

 Open the catalog to page 6
Shipbuilder-Assessment-American-Marine-Highway-7

as illustrated in Figure 3. While economics have proven to be the most significant hurdle to moving AMH forward, the cost of the vessels (even the higher costs of U.S. built Jones Act vessels), was found to represent only 14% of the total cost per trailer. Series production and leveraging international experience could substantially reduce this cost. The most significant costs for AMH on a per trailer basis remain the landside costs including truck drayage to and from the terminals, port costs, and fuel costs. This serves as a reminder to evaluate AMH costs within the context of the total system....

 Open the catalog to page 7
Shipbuilder-Assessment-American-Marine-Highway-8

assessing the commercial viability of AMH. These benefits include: maritime industrial base improvements, national defense, DoD freight movement, sealift benefits, homeland security benefits, increased national goods movement capacity, and significant economic stimulus. Opportunities to Influence Success: Reducing the Costs of AMH Vessels Contrary to expectations, the cost of labor in the U.S. is not a prohibitive factor in the overall cost of a U.S. built vessel. The U.S. ranks third or fourth in the hourly cost of labor compared to other key shipbuilding nations. When compared to world-class...

 Open the catalog to page 8
Shipbuilder-Assessment-American-Marine-Highway-9

Figure 4: Benefits of International Partnerships Figure 5: Experience with International Partnerships A General Dynamics NASSCO Document 8

 Open the catalog to page 9
Shipbuilder-Assessment-American-Marine-Highway-10

Figure 6: International Partnerships and Series Production Impact on Cost 70 70 60 85% Learning Curve Lack of historic volume results in steeper learning curves in U.S. Shipyards Manhours/CGT 50 50 40 40 30 30 20 Manhours/CGT 60 20 92% Learning Curve 10 10 0 0 1 1011 2021 30 31 40 41 50 Ship Number Korean Commodity Shipyard NASSCO (DSEC Model) Korean Specialty Shipyard NASSCO (Historic Practice) Series vessel production can also result in significant economic stimulus. The Shipbuilder’s Council of America estimates7 that the economic multiplier of the U.S. shipbuilding industry is 2.8; meaning...

 Open the catalog to page 10
Shipbuilder-Assessment-American-Marine-Highway-11

awareness of AMH opportunities. However, AMH appears to suffer from a lack of clear, consistent messaging. Coalitions exist to support individual markets, however, no single coalition entity currently exists that can advocate on behalf of AMH as a whole. Therefore, message consistency and an organized process for securing a national strategy and funding in support of AMH goals have suffered. While the potential public benefits of AMH are significant, those benefits will not be realized if the business cannot be financially profitable. A concise message and a targeted, comprehensive informational...

 Open the catalog to page 11
Shipbuilder-Assessment-American-Marine-Highway-12

Introduction The United States is a maritime nation. We have access to coastlines on both east and west boundaries of our country, as well as in the Gulf of Mexico. These coastlines have supported the growth of our nation’s financial and cultural prosperity. Despite our maritime heritage, the United States is no longer a global leader in maritime transport or shipbuilding. The value and quantity of goods imported into the U.S. drive the global economy, however only a small fraction of those goods move on U.S. Flag vessels. Of those, an even smaller percentage of vessels are Jones Act qualified....

 Open the catalog to page 12
Shipbuilder-Assessment-American-Marine-Highway-13

The larger challenge for shipbuilding in the United States is the ability to secure series production. Ship owners, including the U.S. Government, have preferred to have highly specialized vessels in limited quantities. When producing any item in limited amounts, manufacturers struggle to reach maximum benefit through process learning and supply chain advantage. The cost of vessels will decrease as the volume of vessels built in US shipyards goes up. America’s Marine Highway offers a rare opportunity for U.S. shipbuilders because the market is well suited to series vessel production over many...

 Open the catalog to page 13
*Prices are pre-tax. They exclude delivery charges and customs duties and do not include additional charges for installation or activation options. Prices are indicative only and may vary by country, with changes to the cost of raw materials and exchange rates.