You may also be interested in
Classic day-sailer, Sailboat, Cruising sailboat, Cruising sailing-yacht, Daysailer
Text version of the page
The Advantages of Epoxy Resin versus
Polyester in Marine Composite
Structures
Introduction
In any high-tech structural application, where strength, stiffness,
durability and light weight are required, epoxy resins are seen as the
minimum standard of performance for the matrix of the composite.
This is why in aircraft and aerospace applications, as well as
offshore racing boats, epoxies have been the norm for years.
However 95% of pleasure boats under 60 feet today are still made
with polyester resin. The main consideration for materials selection
for most composite builders is cost, with performance and more
importantly value for money often being a secondary consideration.
As a general rule epoxy resins are twice as expensive as vinyl ester
resins and vinyl ester resins are twice as expensive as polyesters.
Since the resin can constitute 40 to 50% of the weight of a
composite component, this price difference is seen as having a
significant impact on the cost of the laminate.
However, when considered against the cost of the whole structure
(the boat) the cost is relatively insignificant, and the value of higher
quality and long term gain of better durability (therefore better resale
value) can be tremendous.
What contributes to this better value…..?
Epoxy resins have performance advantages over polyester and vinyl
esters in five major areas:
s Better adhesive properties (the ability to bond to the
reinforcement or core)
s Superior mechanical properties (particularly strength and
stiffness)
High adhesion is especially important in resistance to micro-cracking
(see later) and when using sandwich construction. The bond
between the core and the laminate is usually the weakest link of the
laminate, and the superior adhesive properties of the epoxy resin
greatly increase the strength of the interface between skins and
core.
Mechanical Properties
Two important mechanical properties of any resin systems are its
tensile strength and stiffness. The figure below shows results of
tests carried out on commercially available polyester, vinyl ester and
epoxy resin systems, either cured at room temperature or post
cured at 175°F.
After a cure period of seven days it can be seen that the tensile
strength of the epoxy resin is 20 to 30% higher than those of
polyester and vinyl ester. More importantly, after post cure the
difference becomes ever greater. It is to be noted that boats built
with polyester resins are rarely post cured in the workshop while
boats built with epoxy quite often are. However, in practice all boats
can quite often see “natural” post cures – particularly dark coloured
surfaces under a Caribbean sun!
The consequences are two fold:
Structurally
A post-cured epoxy laminate will exhibit tensile strength and
modulus (stiffness) close to double that of a non-post cured
polyester or vinyl ester laminate.
Adhesive Properties
Cosmetically
Polyester and vinyl ester resins shrink up to 7% volumetrically and
because the resin continues to cure over long periods of time this
effect may not be immediately obvious. This cure accounts for the
print through effect observed on a lot of older polyester boats. In
comparison, epoxies shrink less than 2% and an epoxy laminate will
be a lot more stable and have better cosmetics over a long period
of time than a polyester one.
Epoxy resins have far better adhesive properties than polyester and
vinyl ester resins. However many times have you known a polyester
car body filler fall off a ding repair? The superior adhesion of epoxy
is due to two main reasons. The first is at the molecular level, where
the presence of polar hydroxyl and ether groups improves adhesion.
The second is at the physical level - as epoxies cure with low
shrinkage, the various surface contacts set up between the liquid
resin and the reinforcement are not disturbed during cure. The result
is a more homogenous bond between fibers and resin and a better
transfer of load between the different components of the matrix.
Comparative Tensile Strength of
Resins
s Improved resistance to fatigue and micro cracking
s Reduced degradation from water ingress (diminution of
properties due to water penetration)
s Increased resistance to osmosis (surface degradation due to
water permeability)
Comparative Stiffness of Resins
|
|